푸에블로는 제가 해본적이 없어서 잘모르겠네요
시타델은 더 인원을 모으시는 편이 잼있을것 같네요

두 게임 모두 2-3인이 플레이하기에 좋습니다

시타델은 그래도 쫌 사람이 모여야 되지 않나 싶네요

시타델 2-3인이 더 흥미롭다는 의견도 많습니다. 아래는 해외에서 긁어온 관련 의견들 입니다.

How does it play? Great! I like it even better with two (or with three, where again each player chooses two characters, but no characters are discarded apart from the initial and the final card) than with 4+ players. It's more tactical (though still not predictable), less chaotic, and an added opportunity for tactics is to plan your move for *both* your characters ahead (e.g. first get gold as the merchant, then spend that on several buildings as the builder).


[Holger Peine, 00]
I love this game with either 2 or 3 players, or with a full group. This versatility makes it probably my favorite "non traditional" card game of all time. I think I prefer it with 2 players, though, in part because of the minimal down time. The challenge of trying to outthink your opponent here continues to work even with only two players. Tense and fun at the same time. You can get a complete game done in less than 30 minutes when playing with 2 or 3. With a full group of 5 to 7 you'll spend up to 90 minutes playing a game. Hans im Gluck components are far better, but the Fantasy Flight set includes expansion characters. Do like I did and buy both. The only pure card game I rate a 10.


[David Vander Ark, '00 & '03]
I think this game plays so well for two, that I won't play it multiplayer anymore! How can I go back to having only one character? In the two-player game, if one of your characters gets assassinated, your other character still gets a turn, so you're not just sitting there watching other people play. Not only that, but because it's just you and your opponent, no longer will the Assassin attempt to hit the leader and kill you by mistake - the assassinations are less random and consequently more strategic. Choosing characters first or second - both have advantages - is more important now and thus the King becomes more valuable than in the multiplayer game. What's amazing is that the game is just as fun, if not more so, with only two, retains all of its mechanics and feel, and plays in about half the time. Why *wouldn't* you play this two-player?


[Dave Arnott, '01]
I'll second other people's choice of Citadels as a 2-player and more game. I believe I might actually prefer the 2p version, but as the developer has mentioned in the past (or maybe it was on the game's website), it really is almost 2 different games within one box. The interaction and the dynamics in the 2p game is much different than with more people.


[Mike Felts, '03]

답변 달아주신 모든 분 정말감사합니다^^
그리고 특히 김우중씨님 해외에서 자료까지 올려주시다니 ㅠㅠ정말 감격입니다ㅎㅎ