아무 곳이나 넣을 수 있습니다. 소련이 남미나 아프리카의 진출을 할 수 있는 카드이기 때문에 강력한 카드죠..

펭군님. 답변 감사해요. twilightstrategy.com 에서도 보니 아무데나 넣는 것 같네요 ㅠㅠ ㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷ



De-Stalinization
Posted on May 29, 2012 by theory
De-StalinizationDe-Stalinization

1956

During the 20th Party Congress, Nikita Khrushchev openly attacked Stalin’s leadership of the Soviet Union. It was seen both inside and outside the Soviet Union as the beginning of a new era. This proved to be a particularly bloody assumption for Nagy’s Hungary. Khrushchev had no intention of “liberalizing” Soviet domination of Eastern Europe, even if he was trying to bring an end to the cult of personality that had characterized internal Soviet government.

Time: Early War
Side: USSR
Ops: 3
Removed after event: Yes

As USSR

This is probably the most important Early War card in the deck. Without De-Stalinization, it will be very difficult to contest the Americas. As such, no matter how tempting, I almost always try to use all of the influence from De-Stalinization into a Mid War region. Occasionally I will put one into Thailand, if I need immediate access to it, but the card is best for fighting for the Mid War regions.

I also rarely headline this card, because it is a very risky card to have Defectored. Moreover, you have to play this at DEFCON 2, so that the US doesn’t just coup out your influence immediately.

If you have Decolonization, then De-Stalinization is an easy choice: all four into the four South American battlegrounds. If you don’t have Decolonization, I will tend to put a couple into Africa (perhaps Angola and Algeria), and the other two into South America (one in Venezuela and one in Argentina or Chile). I don’t usually place it into Central America, because I can coup Panama, Fidel grants me Cuba, and Mexico is too easily realigned out. More importantly, De-Stalinization into South America gives me more access than De-Stalinization into Central America.

Remember that The Voice of America is the perfect antidote to De-Stalinization, so be sure to fortify your position by the Mid War so that VoA cannot just remove all of your influence.

As US

Like Decolonization, this is a hold-until-Turn-3 card. Whether or not the USSR triggers this can be game-deciding, so spacing it on Turn 3 earns you a massive advantage. By Turn 7, this card is mostly useless, and can be safely played for Operations. But I would rather give up West Germany to a Blockade than play this in the Early War.

In many ways, De-Stalinization is like Puppet Governments, with the key difference being that it is guaranteed to be drawn by Turn 3, when it still matters.

초반에 사용될 경우 남미 전장국가 4개를 선점해버리면 정말 강력합니다. 다만 후반으로 가면 갈수록 빛을 잃어버리는 카드죠.

프랑스,동남아시아,남미 들어가기힘든곳에 들어가게해주는 얼리워 소련의 가장강력한카드중 하나입니다.
미국손에 들어가게되면 좌절이죠. (또 다른 강력한카드는 탈식민지화)
다만 3턴에 사용하게될경우 4턴 미국의 보이스카드를 조심해야합니다 ^^